G major
I · V · vi · IV
Paste chord symbols such as G D Em C to compare the progression with all 12 major and 12 minor keys. The ranked result is a transparent theory-based suggestion, not a probability or an audio detection claim. No account or software installation is required.
I · V · vi · IV
III · VII · i · VI
V · outside · iii · I
The percentage measures how many entered roots and chord qualities fit each major or natural-minor scale, with a small tonic and harmonic-minor dominant bonus. It is not a probability that the song is in that key. Borrowed chords, modes and key changes need a listening check.
Enter common chord symbols separated by spaces, commas, bars, or dashes, including enough of the progression to show its resolution.
Compare the three ranked major or minor candidates and inspect which chords received Roman-numeral matches.
Play or sing each suggested tonic, check the bass and melody, and treat borrowed chords or key changes as musical evidence beyond the score.
A key finder from chords compares the roots and qualities in a written progression with chords expected in candidate keys. It can narrow the possibilities when no recording is available, but musical key also depends on tonic emphasis, melody, bass, cadence, mode, and changes over time.
This page gives you a dedicated workspace for key finder from chords, followed by practical guidance for checking and using the result. If you need a different workflow, the related tools below make it easy to continue without starting over.
The parser reduces each recognized symbol to a root plus major, minor, or diminished quality, then scores 24 major and natural-minor candidates. An exact diatonic root-and-quality match earns three points, a diatonic root with another quality earns one, a major dominant in minor earns two additional points, and a tonic root at the beginning or end earns one. Compatibility is the rounded score divided by the maximum available points; it is not a probability.
The parser normalizes recognized A–G chord roots to 12 pitch classes and reduces extensions to a major, minor, or diminished triad quality. It evaluates 12 major and 12 natural-minor candidates: an exact diatonic root-and-quality match earns 3 points, a diatonic root with another quality earns 1, a major dominant in minor adds 2, and a tonic root at either endpoint adds 1. Compatibility is the rounded score divided by three points per chord plus two possible endpoint points. The top three are shown. This is a deterministic fit score—not probability, model confidence, or measured accuracy.
The ranking is deterministic: the same recognized chord sequence produces the same scores. Compatibility describes fit with the documented tables and should not be read as model confidence, measured accuracy or proof of a composer's intended key.
The ranked candidates turn a loose chord list into testable harmonic hypotheses. Songwriters can name a tonal center, musicians can prepare a transposition, and learners can inspect Roman numerals while still seeing plausible alternatives instead of receiving an unexplained single answer.
Turn a typed loop into several candidate tonal centers, then verify the center with melody and resolution.
Identify the most plausible tonic and Roman-numeral pattern before rebuilding the progression in a new key.
Spot symbols that fall outside an otherwise strong key match and review whether they are typos, borrowed chords, or applied harmony.
Compare chord qualities with the major and minor diatonic patterns while keeping alternative readings visible.
Begin with the highest candidate, then compare the alternatives rather than accepting the first label automatically. Play the proposed tonic after the progression and listen for resolution; inspect whether melody and bass emphasize that note; and compare a relative major or minor when the same chords fit both. Roman numerals show exact table matches, while an outside label is a prompt to examine mixture, applied harmony, mode, parsing, or modulation—not evidence that the chord is wrong.
Include a complete, ordered phrase when possible: Enter common chord symbols separated by spaces, commas, bars, or dashes, including enough of the progression to show its resolution. Preserve the cadence and compare close relative-key candidates with the melody, bass and the note that feels like home.
C major and A minor share a key signature and many triads, so C–Am–F–G supports both collections. Order, melody, bass, cadence, and the felt point of rest help distinguish them. The small endpoint-tonic bonus represents only one clue and cannot replace listening.
Compare the leading candidates with the progression in order, not only as a bag of chord names. Play the proposed tonic after the final chord, listen for where the bass and melody settle, and inspect the cadence. Relative major and minor keys share many chords, so the musical point of rest often supplies evidence that a table of chord qualities cannot.
Analyze separate sections when a song changes center, and keep borrowed or applied chords visible instead of deleting them merely to improve a score. The compatibility value documents how well the typed symbols fit one major or natural-minor table. It is a reproducible ranking aid, not a probability that replaces harmonic analysis or listening.
Enter C Am F G. All four triads belong to C major, and the progression begins on C, so C major should rank strongly. A minor shares much of the same pitch collection, however; listen for whether C or A feels like home and inspect the melody before choosing the final label.
Chord symbols alone may not reveal the true key. Relative keys, modes, borrowed chords, secondary dominants, ambiguous spellings, repeated sections, and modulation can change the interpretation. Extensions are simplified to a core triad, and the compatible score is a rule-based fit percentage—not confidence, probability, or measured accuracy.
Play the proposed tonic after the progression, compare the leading alternative and analyze sections separately when borrowed chords or modulation make one global label inadequate.
These technical references provide extra background on the browser features, audio formats or music concepts used on this page.
Read the original reference for more detail.
View reference ↗REFERENCERead the original reference for more detail.
View reference ↗REFERENCERead the original reference for more detail.
View reference ↗This tool runs in your browser and does not require an account. See Privacy & accuracy for file support, result labels and practical limitations. Read about privacy & accuracy.
It compares each recognized chord root and major, minor, or diminished quality with diatonic triads in 12 major and 12 natural-minor keys. Exact matches, tonic placement, and the common major dominant in minor contribute to a documented compatibility score.
No. It is the points earned under this page’s chord-matching rules divided by the available points and rounded to a percentage. It is not calibrated against a song corpus and must not be read as probability, confidence, or accuracy.
Relative major and minor keys share a key signature and many diatonic chords. The tonic usually becomes clearer through cadence, bass, melody, phrase endings, and duration—information that a short unordered chord list cannot fully represent.
Common extensions are reduced to the symbol’s root and a major, minor, or diminished core quality; the extension itself is not scored. Slash-bass and less common notation may be simplified or misread, so enter the main triad symbols when a result looks wrong.
The tool may lower the fit or rank a neighboring key because its table describes one major or minor center at a time. Analyze sections separately and use the out-of-key labels as clues for modal mixture, tonicization, or modulation rather than treating them as errors.